The bench said it was clear that Sebi’s consent could not be mandatory for the court before which the proceeding was pending, for the purpose of exercising the power of compounding under Section 24A
Topics
Supreme Court | SEBI
The Supreme Court on Friday held that the consent of Sebi is not mandatory for compounding offences under section 24A of the Sebi Act, but taking views of the expert body is necessary for stability in the securities market as well as for investor protection.
A bench headed by Justice D Y Chandrachud said that though Sebi was not conferred with any authority to veto a decision for proceeding in trial offences, it is a regulatory and prosecuting agency and the courts must obtain its views since it is an expert body.
The bench said it was clear that Sebi’s consent could not be mandatory for the court before which the proceeding was pending, for the purpose of exercising the power of compounding under Section 24A.
Section 24A of the SEBI Act of 1992 states that, “Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), any offence punishable under this Act, not being an offence punishable with imprisonment only, or with imprisonment and also with fine, may either before or after the institution of any proceeding, be compounded by a Securities Appellate Tribunal or a court before which such proceedings are pending.”
(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor
First Published: Fri, July 23 2021. 22:08 IST
read the full story about Sec 24A offences: Supreme Court says Sebi consent not mandatory
#theheadlines #breakingnews #headlinenews #newstoday #latestnews #aajtak #ndtv #timesofindia #indiannews